Peer Review

0 Items

Renai Journal applies the following review process policy:

  1. Manuscripts sent by authors will go through a review process by the editor, especially checking the suitability of the manuscript with the scope of the journal and suitability with the Journal template. In this process, the editor will communicate with the author so that the manuscript is worthy of being sent to the Reviewer or even returned/decline.
  2. Manuscripts that have passed step 1 (one) above, will be sent to 2 (two) reviewers who are experts in their fields to review their content using the Double blind peer review method.
  3. As a tool that keeps the level of plagiarism below the journal's provisions, the Renai Journal uses the Plagiarism Checker X software.
  4. The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
  5. Reviewers will suggest improvements and/or accept/reject the article.
  6. The editor will decide by considering the reviewer's suggestions whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the Renai Journal.
  7. The editor's decision is final.

All Items

Nothing has been published in this category yet.